<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DirectTV Vs. Versus</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.obsessedwithsports.com/2009/09/01/directtv-vs-versus/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.obsessedwithsports.com/2009/09/01/directtv-vs-versus/</link>
	<description>For obsessed fans, by obsessed fans!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 04:30:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nathanael Angelos</title>
		<link>http://www.obsessedwithsports.com/2009/09/01/directtv-vs-versus/comment-page-3/#comment-8089</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathanael Angelos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 04:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.obsessedwithsports.com/?p=4947#comment-8089</guid>
		<description>Une fois de plus tu partages avec nous un super article. Toutes mes felicitations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Une fois de plus tu partages avec nous un super article. Toutes mes felicitations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Seymour</title>
		<link>http://www.obsessedwithsports.com/2009/09/01/directtv-vs-versus/comment-page-3/#comment-7980</link>
		<dc:creator>John Seymour</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 01:17:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.obsessedwithsports.com/?p=4947#comment-7980</guid>
		<description>The bigger point here is Versus, as a primarily funded by advertisers, should not be charging anything to have their service rebroadcast. If they want to charge the consumer as subscribers (either directly or through third party packages) they should remove or limit advertising on their service. All this double dipping is just plain bad for the people footing the bill, and if it does not stop it will only get worse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The bigger point here is Versus, as a primarily funded by advertisers, should not be charging anything to have their service rebroadcast. If they want to charge the consumer as subscribers (either directly or through third party packages) they should remove or limit advertising on their service. All this double dipping is just plain bad for the people footing the bill, and if it does not stop it will only get worse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Baker</title>
		<link>http://www.obsessedwithsports.com/2009/09/01/directtv-vs-versus/comment-page-3/#comment-7925</link>
		<dc:creator>William Baker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 20:36:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.obsessedwithsports.com/?p=4947#comment-7925</guid>
		<description>Hockey...yuk...I love sports but Hockey,..no way for it is as boring as watching a golf game, grass grow or any silly female sport. I would rather suffer through a Slick Willie telethon of lies or have someone hold a gun on me and force me to look at the Muslim fanatic socialist terrorist lover Hussein Osama Obama. Hockey sounds like something cows and horses do to relieve themselves in a field. In other words...Hockey sucks like politicans, who live in America or Chicago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hockey&#8230;yuk&#8230;I love sports but Hockey,..no way for it is as boring as watching a golf game, grass grow or any silly female sport. I would rather suffer through a Slick Willie telethon of lies or have someone hold a gun on me and force me to look at the Muslim fanatic socialist terrorist lover Hussein Osama Obama. Hockey sounds like something cows and horses do to relieve themselves in a field. In other words&#8230;Hockey sucks like politicans, who live in America or Chicago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: August Schott</title>
		<link>http://www.obsessedwithsports.com/2009/09/01/directtv-vs-versus/comment-page-3/#comment-7920</link>
		<dc:creator>August Schott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 17:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.obsessedwithsports.com/?p=4947#comment-7920</guid>
		<description>I started taking Direct Tv because I love bicycling and their coverage is far better on Versus than any where else...the  Tour de France is watched at least 2 times every day it is on....I have to pay for all the religious crap that I&#039;d never watch and sure not pay for if I had the option....I am presently looking for other ways to watch the Tour de France and shortly plan on canceling Direct Tv, unless something happens fast....they didn&#039;t give me a price break when they quit carrying it.....the whole thing with Direct TV sucks!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I started taking Direct Tv because I love bicycling and their coverage is far better on Versus than any where else&#8230;the  Tour de France is watched at least 2 times every day it is on&#8230;.I have to pay for all the religious crap that I&#8217;d never watch and sure not pay for if I had the option&#8230;.I am presently looking for other ways to watch the Tour de France and shortly plan on canceling Direct Tv, unless something happens fast&#8230;.they didn&#8217;t give me a price break when they quit carrying it&#8230;..the whole thing with Direct TV sucks!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Howard Geiger</title>
		<link>http://www.obsessedwithsports.com/2009/09/01/directtv-vs-versus/comment-page-3/#comment-7796</link>
		<dc:creator>Howard Geiger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 00:21:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.obsessedwithsports.com/?p=4947#comment-7796</guid>
		<description>If Direct TV is so interested in not paying more for Versus because they are protecting their subscribers then why have they kept the price of the package the same as it was before. It seems to me that they should reimburse their customers the price they were paying for Versus or they should ask the hockey fans if they would be willing to pay the extra money for Versus.
What does everyone think of that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Direct TV is so interested in not paying more for Versus because they are protecting their subscribers then why have they kept the price of the package the same as it was before. It seems to me that they should reimburse their customers the price they were paying for Versus or they should ask the hockey fans if they would be willing to pay the extra money for Versus.<br />
What does everyone think of that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
